DreamBox Reading

AI Depth Score Rationale

The score should be 2 (AI-Assisted) rather than 3 (AI-Enhanced). While the product mentions 'Intelligent Adaptive Learning™' and personalization based on engagement and progress data, the evidence is thin and primarily marketing language. The homepage describes the adaptive software as evaluating 'children's interactions and adjusts and readjusts in real time,' which suggests basic adaptive learning/rule-based personalization rather than multiple meaningful AI-driven features throughout the product. There's only one AI capability documented (Personalized Scaffolding) with no AI model disclosure, and the descriptions use terms like 'data-driven' and 'adaptive' which could indicate traditional algorithmic approaches rather than AI. For a score of 3 (AI-Enhanced), we would expect clear evidence of multiple AI-driven features with meaningful integration throughout the product, which is not sufficiently demonstrated here. The functionality described aligns more with AI-Assisted products that offer basic adaptive features.